Offshore Energy
  • Fossil Energy
  • Subsea
  • Alternative Fuels
  • Hydrogen
  • Marine Energy
  • More news
JobsNewsletter
Offshore Energy logo

Your trusted source for global offshore energy news, part of the Navingo network.

Topics
  • Fossil Energy
  • Subsea
  • Alternative Fuels
  • Hydrogen
  • Marine Energy
Network
  • Offshore Energy
  • Offshore Wind
  • NavalToday
  • Dredging Today
Company
  • Advertising
  • Newsletter
  • Jobs
  • Report your news
  • Privacy

© 2026 Navingo. All rights reserved.

Home›Offshore Wind›UK: Former Scientist Finds Nuclear Energy Cheaper than Offshore Wind
Offshore Wind

March 15, 2012 · about 14 years ago

UK: Former Scientist Finds Nuclear Energy Cheaper than Offshore Wind

Sir David King, a former scientist, claims that nuclear energy is a cheaper option than offshore wind, reports Telegraph. If the country wants to cut bad emissions, it will be forced to move heating and transport on to electricity. That means it should produce much more electricity than before. Prof

1 minutes read
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • Email

Sir David King, a former scientist, claims that nuclear energy is a cheaper option than offshore wind, reports Telegraph.

If the country wants to cut bad emissions, it will be forced to move heating and transport on to electricity. That means it should produce much more electricity than before.

Professor King said that huge turbines are too expensive to build and maintain.

He claims: “ If we went all the way attempting to provide the energy we need with offshore wind, I believe the costs to the UK taxpayer would be simply phenomenal. They are extremely expensive to install and expensive to maintain. ”

Right now, the UK government is investing billions of pounds in wind industry, but according to professor King the prices of oil and gas are going to go up in future, and the country should seriously think about building a new fleet of nuclear power stations.

There are nine nuclear power stations in UK right now, and Mr. King’s opinion is there should be around 26 by 2050 to provide enough electricity.

Recently, four leading environmentalists warned about possible financial risks of nuclear new build, and that accelerating the number of nuclear plants is bad idea in general.

[mappress]

Offshore WIND Staff, March 15, 2012

Reach the Offshore Energy industry in one go!

Offshore Energy is read by thousands of professionals every day.

Increase your visibility with banners, tell your story with a branded article, and showcase your expertise with a full-page company profile in our business directory.

CONTACT

Follow Offshore Energy on:

Filed under

Offshore WindNews

Daily Offshore Energy News in Your Mailbox

Join thousands of industry professionals who start their day with our newsletter.

Trending Now

  1. 1Ventura Offshore rig staying longer with Eni and Petronas’ Searah in Southeast Asia
  2. 2Last FSRU in seven-vessel conversion program boosts Karpowership’s LNG-to-power value chain
  3. 3SLB’s grand slam with Aramco puts over 450 oil & gas wells on its plate
  4. 4Chevron and Egypt discuss next steps to speed up Mediterranean gas project

Daily Offshore Energy News in Your Mailbox

Join thousands of industry professionals who start their day with our newsletter.

Subscribe free