Offshore Energy
  • Fossil Energy
  • Subsea
  • Alternative Fuels
  • Hydrogen
  • Marine Energy
  • More news
JobsNewsletter
Offshore Energy logo

Your trusted source for global offshore energy news, part of the Navingo network.

Topics
  • Fossil Energy
  • Subsea
  • Alternative Fuels
  • Hydrogen
  • Marine Energy
Network
  • Offshore Energy
  • Offshore Wind
  • NavalToday
  • Dredging Today
Company
  • Advertising
  • Newsletter
  • Jobs
  • Report your news
  • Privacy

© 2026 Navingo. All rights reserved.

Home›Fossil Energy›Venezuela loses bid to reduce $46M Tidewater award
Fossil Energy

July 10, 2015 · about 11 years ago

Venezuela loses bid to reduce $46M Tidewater award

World Bank Tribunal has rejected Venezuela’s appeal on the ruling in March in a case brought by Tidewater against the Latin American country. On March 13, 2015, the Tribunal ruled in favor of Tidewater, who accused Republic of Venezuela of unlawfully expropriating its oil services business in Venezu

1 minutes read
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • Email

World Bank Tribunal has rejected Venezuela’s appeal on the ruling in March in a case brought by Tidewater against the Latin American country.

On March 13, 2015, the Tribunal ruled in favor of Tidewater, who accused Republic of Venezuela of unlawfully expropriating its oil services business in Venezuela.

The tribunal found that Venezuela had expropriated Tidewater’s investment in its Venezuelan subsidiary SEMARCA without payment of prompt, adequate and effective compensation.

It determined that Tidewater was entitled to be compensated for that expropriation, and calculated the principal amount of the compensation to be paid as $46.4 million.

Looking to reduce the amount it has to pay, Venezuela applied for a revision of the ruling. Making its case, Venezuela claimed that the tribunal had based its decision on a document containing a typographical error, according to which the estimated value of SEMARCA was $31.9 million instead of $13.9 million.

Venezuela claimed that if the tribunal had been aware of this fact, the award would have been between $27 million and $35 million.

The tribunal acknowledged that there had been a clerical error in transcription. However, it said the error was not of such nature ‘as decisively to affect the award,’ and dismissed the application for revision, affirming its initial ruling of $46.4 million as final.

Offshore Energy Today Staff

Reach the Offshore Energy industry in one go!

Offshore Energy is read by thousands of professionals every day.

Increase your visibility with banners, tell your story with a branded article, and showcase your expertise with a full-page company profile in our business directory.

CONTACT

Follow Offshore Energy on:

Filed under

Fossil EnergyNews

Daily Offshore Energy News in Your Mailbox

Join thousands of industry professionals who start their day with our newsletter.

Trending Now

  1. 1Halliburton bags Eni’s deepwater bundle as Eastern Mediterranean gas buildout continues
  2. 2TechnipFMC picks up multimillion-dollar subsea scope for Petronas’ deepwater project
  3. 3Southeast Asia’s hydrocarbon push: Valeura hits oil pay, eyes new satellite development
  4. 4FSRU docks in Stade as LNG terminal prepares to feed gas into German grid from November

Daily Offshore Energy News in Your Mailbox

Join thousands of industry professionals who start their day with our newsletter.

Subscribe free