Offshore Energy
  • Fossil Energy
  • Subsea
  • Alternative Fuels
  • Hydrogen
  • Marine Energy
  • More news
JobsNewsletter
Offshore Energy logo
Topics
  • Fossil Energy
  • Subsea
  • Alternative Fuels
  • Hydrogen
  • Marine Energy
Network
  • Offshore Energy
  • Offshore Wind
  • NavalToday
  • Dredging Today
Company
  • Advertising
  • Newsletter
  • Jobs
  • Report your news
  • Privacy

© 2026 Navingo. All rights reserved.

Home›Subsea›Senator Booker Against Seismic Testing in Atlantic Ocean
Subsea

August 31, 2015 · about 11 years ago

Senator Booker Against Seismic Testing in Atlantic Ocean

U.S. Senator Cory Booker has sent a letter to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Administrator Dr. Kathryn Sullivan urging her to deny four seismic survey applications for oil and gas exploration in the Atlantic Ocean. In the letter, Sen. Booker calls the applications incompl

3 minutes read
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • Email

U.S. Senator Cory Booker has sent a letter to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Administrator Dr. Kathryn Sullivan urging her to deny four seismic survey applications for oil and gas exploration in the Atlantic Ocean.

In the letter, Sen. Booker calls the applications incomplete because they fail to address the cumulative long-range impacts that seismic activity poses to marine life.

Sen. Cory Booker said: “Seismic airgun surveys disrupt foraging and other vital behaviors in endangered whales, dramatically depress catch rates of commercial fish, and can impact a wide range of marine species over extraordinarily large areas of ocean. In March, a group of seventy-five marine scientists, including some of the nation’s leading experts in marine biology and bioacoustics, concluded that the seismic airgun activity proposed off the Atlantic coast is likely to have significant, long-lasting, and widespread impacts on the reproduction and survival of marine mammals and other species throughout the region.”

Booker continued, “The applications under consideration represent a serious threat to New Jersey’s coastal economy and coastal wildlife. I respectfully ask that NMFS determine these four applications to be incomplete and inadequate, and deny them in their entirety.”

Read the full text of the letter below:

Dear Dr. Sullivan: I am writing to comment on the four seismic survey applications for oil-and-gas exploration in the Mid-Atlantic that the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) is presently considering in connection with Incidental Harassment Authorization requests under the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA). As NOAA has long recognized, ocean noise represents a significant threat to marine mammals, fish and other marine life which depend on sound for the most basic aspects of their reproduction and survival. Seismic airgun surveys disrupt foraging and other vital behaviors in endangered whales, dramatically depress catch rates of commercial fish, and can impact a wide range of marine species over extraordinarily large areas of ocean. In March, a group of seventy-five marine scientists, including some of the nation’s leading experts in marine biology and bioacoustics, concluded that the seismic airgun activity proposed off the Atlantic coast is likely to have significant, long-lasting, and widespread impacts on the reproduction and survival of marine mammals and other species throughout the region. On July 29, NMFS published a “notice of receipt of applications” in the Federal Register, and requested comments from the public on several broad topics related to the agency’s consideration of the four seismic survey applications initially under review. These four applications appear to be incomplete and inadequate, contrary to what NMFS’ regulations require for further review and approval. 50 C.F.R. §216.104(b)(1). For example, none of the applications address the cumulative, long-range impacts that the scientific community has identified as a major environmental concern. The applications appear to assume that impacts will occur only a short distance from the seismic vessel, in contradiction of the best scientific evidence; they fail to consider the reasonably foreseeable impacts of other seismic surveys in their assessment of impacts; and they do not propose or even consider any mitigation that might reduce those far-reaching, cumulative effects. The applications under consideration represent a serious threat to New Jersey’s coastal economy and coastal wildlife. I respectfully ask that NMFS determine these four applications to be incomplete and inadequate, and deny them in their entirety. Cory A. Booker

Press Release

Reach the Offshore Energy industry in one go!

Offshore Energy is read by thousands of professionals every day.

Increase your visibility with banners, tell your story with a branded article, and showcase your expertise with a full-page company profile in our business directory.

CONTACT

Follow Offshore Energy on:

Filed under

SubseaNews

Home of Energy Transition

Join thousands of industry professionals who start their day with our newsletter.

Trending Now

  1. 1Hybrid electric propulsion at the heart of next-gen LNG carrier design
  2. 2Shell and MET Group pen new multi-year US LNG supply deal
  3. 3New US wave power test facility on Carnegie Clean Energy contender list for potential CETO demo
  4. 4Germany-UAE energy ties deepen as RWE, Masdar and ADNOC eye LNG supply and €3B offshore wind investment

Home of Energy Transition

Join thousands of industry professionals who start their day with our newsletter.

Subscribe free