Offshore Energy
  • Fossil Energy
  • Subsea
  • Alternative Fuels
  • Hydrogen
  • Marine Energy
  • More news
JobsNewsletter
Offshore Energy logo

Your trusted source for global offshore energy news, part of the Navingo network.

Topics
  • Fossil Energy
  • Subsea
  • Alternative Fuels
  • Hydrogen
  • Marine Energy
Network
  • Offshore Energy
  • Offshore Wind
  • NavalToday
  • Dredging Today
Company
  • Advertising
  • Newsletter
  • Jobs
  • Report your news
  • Privacy

© 2026 Navingo. All rights reserved.

Home›Fossil Energy›Songa on rig spat: DSME the one responsible
Fossil Energy

August 26, 2016 · about 10 years ago

Songa on rig spat: DSME the one responsible

Songa Offshore, an Oslo-listed offshore drilling contractor, is standing its ground regarding the dispute with South Korea’s shipbuilder Daewoo Shipbuilding and Marine Engineering Co (DSME) over two drilling rigs, the Songa Equinox and Songa Endurance. To remind DSME, which built four Cat D rigs for

2 minutes read
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • Email

Songa Offshore, an Oslo-listed offshore drilling contractor, is standing its ground regarding the dispute with South Korea’s shipbuilder Daewoo Shipbuilding and Marine Engineering Co (DSME) over two drilling rigs, the Songa Equinox and Songa Endurance.

To remind DSME, which built four Cat D rigs for Songa Offshore, in 2015 launched arbitration proceedings in respect of the construction contracts for the two first Cat D rigs.

DSME is seeking damages of $373 million including repayment on liquidated damages of $44 million.

The claims relate to alleged cost overruns and additional work on the rigs due to what DSME alleges were inherent errors and omissions in the design documents (often referred to as the FEED package).

On March 18, 2016, Songa Offshore submitted a $65.8 million counterclaim against DSME for the two first Cat D rigs with the intention of recovering damages caused by the default of DSME. The arbitration of these claims and counterclaim is still ongoing.

Apart from a counterclaim, Songa also submitted its defense in the arbitrations and stated that DSME is the only guilty party for the cost overruns.

In its second quarter financials presentation on Friday, Songa Offshore said it remains confident of its position. It still sees DSME as the responsible party for the delays, and said that any attempt to recover cost overruns is of no merit due to the “turn-key” nature of the construction contracts.

Songa Offshore added that it had obtained legal opinions from highly reputable law firms in the UK and Norway and a Queen’s Counsel all of which confirm the company’s position.

Reach the Offshore Energy industry in one go!

Offshore Energy is read by thousands of professionals every day.

Increase your visibility with banners, tell your story with a branded article, and showcase your expertise with a full-page company profile in our business directory.

CONTACT

Follow Offshore Energy on:

Filed under

Fossil EnergyExploration & Production

Daily Offshore Energy News in Your Mailbox

Join thousands of industry professionals who start their day with our newsletter.

Trending Now

  1. 1TotalEnergies, Staatsolie and APA advancing $12.2B oil project ahead of 2027 drilling ops
  2. 2New gas discovery springs up from India’s frontier deepwater basin
  3. 3Legal showdown underway as Cotemar moves to freeze almost $60M in American Bureau of Shipping subsidiary’s assets
  4. 4Jan De Nul orders another newbuild trenching support vessel

Daily Offshore Energy News in Your Mailbox

Join thousands of industry professionals who start their day with our newsletter.

Subscribe free