Offshore Energy
  • Fossil Energy
  • Subsea
  • Alternative Fuels
  • Hydrogen
  • Marine Energy
  • More news
JobsNewsletter
Offshore Energy logo
Topics
  • Fossil Energy
  • Subsea
  • Alternative Fuels
  • Hydrogen
  • Marine Energy
Network
  • Offshore Energy
  • Offshore Wind
  • NavalToday
  • Dredging Today
Company
  • Advertising
  • Newsletter
  • Jobs
  • Report your news
  • Privacy

© 2026 Navingo. All rights reserved.

Home›Green Marine›New US port tariffs could do more harm than good: World Shipping Council asks for ‘constructive’ pathways
Green Marine

April 21, 2025 · about 1 year ago

New US port tariffs could do more harm than good: World Shipping Council asks for ‘constructive’ pathways

The World Shipping Council (WSC)—the voice of liner shipping—has expressed ‘serious’ concerns regarding the new port fee regime announced by the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR), cautioning that the measures could undermine American trade, hurt U.S. producers, and weaken efforts to strengthen the na

3 minutes read
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • Email
World Shipping Council
Illustration. Image by Kees Torn on Flickr under CC BY-SA 2.0 license

The World Shipping Council (WSC)—the voice of liner shipping—has expressed ‘serious’ concerns regarding the new port fee regime announced by the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR), cautioning that the measures could undermine American trade, hurt U.S. producers, and weaken efforts to strengthen the nation’s maritime industry.

Last week, USTR laid out plans to introduce fees on Chinese ships calling American ports. The move is part of a broader strategy to revive the local maritime and shipbuilding industry and curb China’s dominance in the sector.

This content is available after accepting the cookies.

“Revitalizing America’s maritime sector is an important and widely shared goal — one that requires a long-term, legislative and industrial strategy. We welcomed the vision outlined in the President’s Executive Order, which proposes targeted initiatives to strengthen U.S. shipbuilding, ports, and supply chain resilience ,” Joe Kramek , President and CEO of the World Shipping Council, commented.

“Unfortunately, the fee regime announced by USTR is a step in the wrong direction as it will raise prices for consumers, weaken U.S. trade and do little to revitalize the U.S. maritime industry.”

Specifically, the World Shipping Council outlined several key concerns:

The WSC has once again urged the Administration to reconsider ‘this counterproductive’ measure, which risks harming U.S. consumers, manufacturers, and farmers without delivering meaningful progress toward revitalizing the U.S. maritime industry.

The council added that constructive pathways — such as targeted investment incentives, infrastructure improvements, and streamlined regulatory processes — can deliver lasting benefits without disrupting U.S. trade or raising costs for American producers and consumers. It is also important to recognize that the U.S. shipbuilding sector already faces significant constraints, including a backlog of military orders and ongoing labor shortages. Similarly, a shortage of trained and certified U.S. mariners limits the potential to expand U.S.-flag shipping, even if the regulatory environment was improved.

Liner shipping moves 65% of U.S. seaborne trade, contributes more than $2 trillion annually to the U.S. economy, and supports 6.4 million American jobs paying more than $420 billion in wages. WSC members also represent 75% of the vessels enrolled in the U.S. Maritime Security Program.

“We urge policymakers to pursue strategies that encourage growth, strengthen supply chain resilience, and avoid actions that risk harming American exporters, producers, and consumers at a time when global trade is already under pressure,” Kramek concluded.

Initially, the Office of the United States Trade Representative proposed a measure to charge a fee of up to $1.5 million for Chinese-built vessels entering US ports. The proposal was part of an investigation in which USTR found China’s targeting for dominance ‘unreasonable’ because it lessens competition and creates dependencies on the country while restricting US commerce.

Related Articles

Green Marine

Welcome, (neo)protectionism: US may target Chinese ships with up to $1.5M port fee

3 min read

Last month, WSC already urged the USTR to abandon its proposal for $1.5 million retroactive fees on port calls for Chinese-built vessels. The association warned that the proposed tariffs could exacerbate inflation for US consumers as well as businesses, jeopardize jobs and ‘disproportionately’ harm United States-based farmers and other exporters.

This content is available after accepting the cookies.

Read more

Reach the Offshore Energy industry in one go!

Offshore Energy is read by thousands of professionals every day.

Increase your visibility with banners, tell your story with a branded article, and showcase your expertise with a full-page company profile in our business directory.

CONTACT

Follow Offshore Energy on:

Filed under

Green MarineRegulations & PolicyShipbuildingAuthorities & GovernmentMarket OutlooksOutlook & StrategyRegulation & PolicyRules & Regulation

Home of Energy Transition

Join thousands of industry professionals who start their day with our newsletter.

Trending Now

  1. 1SED Energy Holdings and Ventura Offshore to unite into one
  2. 2New Boskalis rock installation vessel starts work offshore Poland
  3. 321 companies apply for Norway’s new oil & gas exploration areas
  4. 4Spanish shipyard launches its largest-ever vessel, built for Østensjø Rederi

Home of Energy Transition

Join thousands of industry professionals who start their day with our newsletter.

Subscribe free